Sorcha Faal


The Empire Strikes Back, No Dissent Allowed
4,October, 2007, 6:51 am
Filed under: 1

 

“Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” George Orwell

How pleasant were my dreams of coming to America, but brutality was what awaited me.

As my Air France flight descended into Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta, Georgia it was wonderful for me to see the dark hued greens of the American South I had enjoyed so many years ago while studying in the United States…my joy was to be short lived.

Upon disembarking from the plane my fellow passengers and I were put into a virtual cattle line of queues by black uniformed, machine gun touting officers of the   United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau. The acronym for this US police agency is ICE, and which is well suited in describing their intimidating manner of treating the guests of the United States and their morality in dealing with women and children.

“Step out of line again and you WILL be arrested!” came the sharp retort of an ICE officer towards a young English mother attempting to keep her young child from running out of the queue, a statement that shocked all who heard, but none dared protest against.  For as Europeans we have long learned the lessons of police brutality from travels in the former communist nations of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union.

But, in America?  In today’s world? …and against Europeans who have overcome centuries of warfare and bloodshed so that our continent can now be traveled in relative peace?  Sadly yes, but in retrospect to be expected under the present circumstances of an America more resembling those Eastern European nations of old instead of the land of ‘freedom and liberty’ it once aspired to.

Upon the presentation of my passport to the ICE agents, and their comparing the information on it against whatever their computer monitor was saying, I was abruptly whisked out of the queue and brought by two ICE agents to a small room with two chairs, one small desk and no windows.

The efficiency of the ICE agents was matched only by their seemingly total lack of empathy and understanding for any ‘foreigner’ daring to come into their fearful presence, of which by the computer information they had received about me made such a person.

It was quickly told to me by the ICE agent in charge that my admittance to the United States was being denied because I had violated the provisions of the United States Visa Waiver Program ( a programme where citizens of many countries, including Ireland, are allowed visa free travel to the US for up to 90 days) as members of the foreign press were required to apply for a visa prior to entry into the US, and of which they considered me to be.

[It is interesting to note that after traveling to, and through, the United States for over 20 years no such requirement was ever placed upon me.]

I have long learned in my life that protests against state police authorities, from any totalitarian government, is futile at its best, downright dangerous at its worst, so my only questions were related to the procedures involved in repatriating myself to Ireland.

My first request to be able to talk by phone to an Irish counselor official were denied as I was not being ‘detained’, I was merely being denied entrance into the United States and therefore had no rights. (As I was clearly on American soil this answer seemed patently absurd, but when confronted by ICE agents with weapons the wisest course of action is inaction.

I was fortunate enough to be able to obtain a return flight to Heathrow via Lufthansa, and who accepted my Air France return ticket.  The unfortunate part was the six hours it took to finally leave America and having to be ‘escorted’ by two armed ICE agents, the female one even having to accompany me into the loo.

It is one thing learning about the United States, and Americans, from afar, in seeing how far they have descended into a virtual police state is almost beyond description, other than the obvious comparisons with other brutish states around the world, both past, and present.

Most frightening about all of this to me, however, has nothing to do with myself, but rather what this is doing to the American people behind the black-uniformed ranks currently surrounding Americas borders.  When a person, such as myself, is deemed such a ‘threat’ to the United States that the mere presence of my being in that country calls for my immediate expulsion, one must truly wonder how grave the situation is for those people imprisoned in the gulag called America.

As I look out the window to my left at the great expanse of the Arctic wastelands, with their ever white peaks grandly reaching towards the stark blue sky, I am at peace with this adventure, though saddened by it too.

For in a world ruled by madmen, when one of the greatest nations ever known has been reduced to a police state, one truly understands the great perils facing our world today.

With God,

Sorcha Faal

Somewhere over the North Atlantic

[Note: This communication from Sorcha Faal was just received by us with instructions to prepare for her expected lecture in Georgia, USA, to take place, instead, in Ireland on Sunday.  For those of you who had planned on attending Sorcha Faal’s lecture in Georgia you will receive the DVD of this lecture at no further cost.]

Advertisements


The News of Propaganda
13,August, 2007, 5:46 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

During the mid to late 15th Century a new word emerged from what is now called the Middle English period called newes, or newis. In today’s world we know this word as news.  But what does it mean?

 

In its original 15th Century meaning the word newes was simply the tidings of new things; today the word news means the reporting of recent events, intelligence or information.

 

It is interesting to note, too, that the letters of the word news is also an acronym for the Cardinal Points of geography: North…East…West….South.

 

There is no discussion of news that can be made complete without also discussing the word propaganda, and which is short for the New Latin Sacra Congregātiō dē Prōpagandā Fidē (Sacred Congregation for Propagating the Faith) established in 1622 by Pope Gregory XV for the training of Catholic priests for oversees missions.

 

The meaning of the word propaganda is: “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.”

 

What is important to realize about the word propaganda is that it is in and of itself a neutral word, not one of a strictly negative connotation with which it is viewed in today’s world.

 

This is so because it carries both positive and negative connotations and can be used for either good or evil, which one depending upon whom is using it and for what reason.

 

With the above being understood, about both news and propaganda, you should be able to see clearly that all news is propaganda, but not all propaganda is news.  And, the only way for anyone to be able to understand the difference is through their own personal experience and education.

 

Between the two most readily available ‘verifiers’ one has in ascertaining the truth of news/propaganda, experience and education, it should always be remembered that education (the act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment) is what has prepared a person for accepting news/propaganda as fact. And in almost all circumstances does not allow for the use of experience as a part of finding, and knowing, truth.

 

Experience (the observing, encountering, or undergoing of things as they occur in the course of time), on the other hand, has always been human beings most reliable resource for survival because when it is trusted allows one to be able to see the greater truth that underlies all news/propaganda.

 

The events of September 11th (9/11) are a case in point due to the fact that every human beings experience has shown that though aircraft had previously crashed into buildings, and that skyscrapers had previously burned, none had ever collapsed…ever.

 

Buildings that collapsed like those of the three buildings of the World Trade Center, and as our experience knows, could only be accomplished by their implosion by explosive devices previously planted within them.

 

However, confronting what your experience was showing you as the truth was the educational reinforced news/propaganda telling you the exact opposite.

 

Whom you believed, either your own experience or the news/propaganda, is the most accurate guide available to you so as to ascertain who you are, what you are, and what you are.

 

News, Propaganda, Education, Experience are all to be used in a complimentary dance with one another, never one above the other, never one without the others.  To know this, and to use it, will lead anyone to the greater meaning of all things.

 

I would be greatly interested in hearing your thoughts on this.

 

Sorcha Faal

Dublin, Ireland

13 August 2007



Objective Reality?
11,July, 2007, 11:57 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

I would like to offer up for discussion a book I have recently read titled “The Holographic Universe – Does Objective Reality Exist?” written by Michael Talbot.

I would be interested in hearing your ideas/thoughts/opinions on this excerpt.

“In 1982 a remarkable event took Place. At the University of Paris a Research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th Century.
You did not hear about it on the evening News. In fact, unless you are in the habit of reading scientific journals you probably have never even heard Aspect’s name, though there are some who believe his discovery may change the face of science. 

Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn’t matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.  Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing.

The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein’s long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain away Aspect’s findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations. University of London physicist David Bohm, for example, believes Aspect’s findings imply that objective reality does not exist, that despite its apparent solidity the universe is at heart a phantasm, a gigantic and splendidly detailed hologram. 

To understand why Bohm makes this startling assertion, one must first understand a little about holograms. A hologram is a three- dimensional photograph made with the aid of a laser.  To make a hologram, the object to be photographed is first bathed in the light of a laser beam. Then a second laser beam is bounced off the reflected light of the first and the resulting interference pattern (the area where the two laser beams commingle) is captured on film.  When the film is developed, it looks like a meaningless swirl of light and dark lines. But as soon as the developed film is illuminated by another laser beam, a three-dimensional image of the original object appears. 

The three-dimensionality of such images is not the only remarkable characteristic of holograms. If a hologram of a rose is cut in half and then illuminated by a laser, each half will still be found to contain the entire image of the Rose.  Indeed, even if the halves are divided again, each snippet of film will always be found to contain a smaller but intact version of the original image. Unlike normal photographs, every part of a hologram contains all the information possessed by the whole.

The “whole in every part” nature of a hologram provides us with an entirely new way of understanding organization and order. For most of its history, Western science has labored under the bias that the best way to understand a physical phenomenon, whether a frog or an atom, is to dissect it and study its respective parts.  A hologram teaches us that some things in the universe may not lend themselves to this approach. If we try to take apart something constructed holographically, we will not get the pieces of which it is made, we will only get smaller wholes.

This insight suggested to Bohm another way of understanding Aspect’s discovery. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness is an illusion. He argues that at some deeper level of reality such particles are not individual entities, but are actually extensions of the same fundamental something. 

To enable people to better visualize what he means, Bohm offers the following illustration.  Imagine an aquarium containing a fish. Imagine also that you are unable to see the aquarium directly and your knowledge about it and what it contains comes from two television cameras, one directed at the aquarium’s front and the other directed at its side.  As you stare at the two television monitors, you might assume that the fish on each of the screens are separate entities. After all, because the cameras are set at different angles, each of the images will be slightly different. But as you continue to watch the two fish, you will eventually become aware that there is a certain relationship between them.  When one turns, the other also makes a slightly different but corresponding turn; when one faces the front, the other always faces toward the side. If you remain unaware of the full scope of the situation, you might even conclude that the fish must be instantaneously communicating with one another, but this is clearly not the case. 

This, says Bohm, is precisely what is going on between the subatomic particles in Aspect’s experiment.  According to Bohm, the apparent faster-than-light connection between subatomic particles is really telling us that there is a deeper level of reality we are not privy to, a more complex dimension beyond our own that is analogous to the aquarium. And, he adds, we view objects such as subatomic particles as separate from one another because we are seeing only a portion of their reality. Such particles are not separate “parts”, but facets of a deeper and more underlying unity that is ultimately as holographic and indivisible as the previously mentioned rose.

And since everything in physical reality is comprised of these “eidolons”, the universe is itself a projection, a hologram.  In addition to its phantomlike nature, such a universe would possess other rather startling features. If the apparent separateness of subatomic particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all things in the universe are infinitely interconnected.  The electrons in a carbon atom in the human brain are connected to the subatomic particles that comprise every salmon that swims, every heart that beats, and every star that shimmers in the sky.

Everything interpenetrates everything, and although human nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of necessity artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web.  In a holographic universe, even time and space could no longer be viewed as fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break down in a universe in which nothing is truly separate from anything else, time and three-dimensional space, like the images of the fish on the TV monitors, would also have to be viewed as projections of this deeper order.  At its deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously.

This suggests that given the proper tools it might even be possible to someday reach into the superholographic level of reality and pluck out scenes from the long- forgotten past.  What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question. Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the matrix that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it contains every subatomic particle that has been or will be — every configuration of matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from blue whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse of “All That Is.” 

Although Bohm concedes that we have no way of knowing what else might lie hidden in the superhologram, he does venture to say that we have no reason to assume it does not contain more. Or as he puts it, perhaps the superholographic level of reality is a “mere stage” beyond which lies “an infinity of further development”.  Bohm is not the only researcher who has found evidence that the universe is a hologram.

Working independently in the field of brain research, Standford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has also become persuaded of the holographic nature of reality. Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how and where memories are stored in the brain. For decades numerous studies have shown that rather than being confined to a specific location, memories are dispersed throughout the brain. 

In a series of landmark experiments in the 1920s, brain scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter what portion of a rat’s brain he removed he was unable to eradicate its memory of how to perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only problem was that no one was able to come up with a mechanism that might explain this curious “whole in every part” nature of memory storage. 

Then in the 1960s Pribram encountered the concept of holography and realized he had found the explanation brain scientists had been looking for. Pribram believes memories are encoded not in neurons, or small groupings of neurons, but in patterns of nerve impulses that crisscross the entire brain in the same way that patterns of laser light interference crisscross the entire area of a piece of film containing a holographic image. In other words, Pribram believes the brain is itself a hologram. 

Pribram’s theory also explains how the human brain can store so many memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the human brain has the capacity to memorize something on the order of 10 billion bits of information during the average human lifetime (or roughly the same amount of information contained in five sets of the Encyclopaedia Britannica).  Similarly, it has been discovered that in addition to their other capabilities, holograms possess an astounding capacity for information storage–simply by changing the angle at which the two lasers strike a piece of photographic film, it is possible to record many different images on the same surface. It has been demonstrated that one cubic centimeter of film can hold as many as 10 billion bits of information.

Our uncanny ability to quickly retrieve whatever information we need from the enormous store of our memories becomes more understandable if the brain functions according to holographic principles. If a friend asks you to tell him what comes to mind when he says the word “zebra”, you do not have to clumsily sort back through some gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file to arrive at an answer. Instead, associations like “striped”, “horselike”, and “animal native to Africa” all pop into your head instantly.  Indeed, one of the most amazing things about the human thinking process is that every piece of information seems instantly cross- correlated with every other piece of information–another feature intrinsic to the hologram. Because every portion of a hologram is infinitely interconnected with ever other portion, it is perhaps nature’s supreme example of a cross-correlated system. 

The storage of memory is not the only neurophysiological puzzle that becomes more tractable in light of Pribram’s holographic model of the brain. Another is how the brain is able to translate the avalanche of frequencies it receives via the senses (light frequencies, sound frequencies, and so on) into the concrete world of our perceptions. Encoding and decoding frequencies is precisely what a hologram does best. Just as a hologram functions as a sort of lens, a translating device able to convert an apparently meaningless blur of frequencies into a coherent image, Pribram believes the brain also comprises a lens and uses holographic principles to mathematically convert the frequencies it receives through the senses into the inner world of our perceptions.  An impressive body of evidence suggests that the brain uses holographic principles to perform its operations.

Pribram’s theory, in fact, has gained increasing support among neurophysiologists. Argentinian-Italian researcher Hugo Zucarelli recently extended the holographic model into the world of acoustic phenomena. Puzzled by the fact that humans can locate the source of sounds without moving their heads, even if they only possess hearing in one ear, Zucarelli discovered that holographic principles can explain this ability.  Zucarelli has also developed the technology of holophonic sound, a recording technique able to reproduce acoustic situations with an almost uncanny realism. 

Pribram’s belief that our brains mathematically construct “hard” reality by relying on input from a frequency domain has also received a good deal of experimental support.  It has been found that each of our senses is sensitive to a much broader range of frequencies than was previously suspected.  Researchers have discovered, for instance, that our visual systems are sensitive to sound frequencies, that our sense of smell is in part dependent on what are now called “cosmic frequencies”, and that even the cells in our bodies are sensitive to a broad range of frequencies.

Such findings suggest that it is only in the holographic domain of consciousness that such frequencies are sorted out and divided up into conventional perceptions.  But the most mind-boggling aspect of Pribram’s holographic model of the brain is what happens when it is put together with Bohm’s theory. For if the concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what is “there” is actually a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain is also a hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes of objective reality?  Put quite simply, it ceases to exist.

As the religions of the East have long upheld, the material world is Maya, an illusion, and although we may think we are physical beings moving through a physical world, this too is an illusion.  We are really “receivers” floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. 

This striking new picture of reality, the synthesis of Bohm and Pribram’s views, has come to be called the holographic paradigm, and although many scientists have greeted it with skepticism, it has galvanized others. A small but growing group of researchers believe it may be the most accurate model of reality science has arrived at thus far. More than that, some believe it may solve some mysteries that have never before been explainable by science and even establish the paranormal as a part of nature.  Numerous researchers, including Bohm and Pribram, have noted that many para-psychological phenomena become much more understandable in terms of the holographic paradigm. 

In a universe in which individual brains are actually indivisible portions of the greater hologram and everything is infinitely interconnected, telepathy may merely be the accessing of the holographic level.  It is obviously much easier to understand how information can travel from the mind of individual ‘A’ to that of individual ‘B’ at a far distance point and helps to understand a number of unsolved puzzles in psychology. In particular, Grof feels the holographic paradigm offers a model for understanding many of the baffling phenomena experienced by individuals during altered states of consciousness.”



What Is The Logic In Supporting American War
24,May, 2007, 8:39 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

As you can imagine I receive hundreds of emails on a daily basis, all of which are read, though not necessarily by me.  Ones that ask specific questions, however, are always forwarded to me, deliberated upon, and (maybe) answered.

 

Lately I’ve noticed a change in the emails from the
United States, and not a good change either.

 

The ones I am talking about here are those deriding my lack of support for the war the
United States is fighting.  Some even accuse me of treason, which I find strange in that I know of no
US laws that target foreigners for such an offense.

 

What perplexes me the most about these types of emails are how utterly lacking in their own history many Americans appear to be, especially with the American Founding Fathers warning their citizens against becoming entangled in foreign wars and ‘adventures’.

 

Even more lacking are many Americans understanding of the wars that being fought in their name, whom they are fighting against, and what the
United States stands to win, or lose, in them.

 

This is further complicated by these American peoples seeming quiescence to the Military junta currently controlling their lives.  Why is this so?

 

I, of course, have my own opinions of these things but would very much like to hear from you as to why you think this is so?

 

Sorcha Faal


Dublin, Ireland  

 

 



Sorcha Faal responds to Herald Sun
13,May, 2007, 10:45 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Hello Again Everyone,

 

And, once again, I must apologize for my prolonged absence from this medium of exchange to converse with you.

 

These past two months have been very busy ones for me with my main focus being upon on Orders in the Middle East, especially in Egypt and
Turkey.

 

Since my last visit to these countries I was surprised with how high the anger against the
United States has risen, some of it justified, most of it not.  Even more surprising was the lack of knowledge, as seen from the American press, the American people have of this.

 

With the advent of the Internet the availability of news to the American people cannot be the issue for this being so, what appears to be the case is the West’s ability to censor news from competing Nations by allegation alone.

 

A case in point is a recent report we wrote wherein we detailed the catastrophic drought facing
Australia and one of their governments plans to deal with it.

 

You can read this report yourself at http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1006.htm and it is titled “Australia Begins Secret Talks On Evacuating Half Of Continent Due To Epic Drought”.

 

The response from the mainstream media in Australia was both predictable and instructive, a case in point was
Australia’s largest selling newspaper The Herald Sun, and I quote from their article titled “Drowning in drivel”
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21695150-25717,00.html?from=public_rss

 

“WE’RE told so many mad scare stories about global warming, why shouldn’t Art Bell believe this one, too? 

And so the radio host and best-selling author last weekend read out to his audience on Coast to Coast, one of
America’s most listened-to shows, this latest report he’d picked about our warming horror:
 

“Shocking reports from the Kremlin today are showing that . . . the Government of Australia has entered into secret negotiations with the
United States and their Commonwealth allies for the proposed evacuation of upwards of 11 million of its 20 million citizens.”
 

On he went, telling millions of Americans that our drought was so bad – curse you, global warming! – that the Howard Government might soon hire cruise ships to send us somewhere cooler, once it figured who’d take us.  

To Bell, this was the last straw.  

“I wonder when the climate sceptics are going to finally catch on,” he raged.  

“Will it take something like this? Like evacuating half a nation, before we wake up and realise that it is actually happening?”  

Oh, I’ve caught on all right to what’s happening, Art. Caught on to you, for a start.  

You might think the moral of this farce is not to trust even million-hit websites such as WorldNetDaily, which ran the story Bell read out so credulously, or the news site run by the New-Age nutter who actually dreamed up this hoax, a blogger posing as Russian scientist “Sorcha Faal”.”

 

Now notice that I am called by the Herald Sun a ‘New-Age nutter’ and a ‘Russian scientist’, neither of which is true and even the most brief of searches at WhatDoesItMean.Com would verify. http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index738.htm

 

One would also think that a newspaper as important, and widely read, as the Herald Sun would attempt to verify the information they print, in this case about me.  But, even though my phone number and email address are plainly stated at WhatDoesItMean.Com http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index677.htm neither an email or phone request for information was received by me from them.

 

But, and most importantly, this prestigious Australian mainstream newspaper did not refute one single fact of the report, not a single one.

 

Why?  Because they couldn’t.  It is as simple as that.

 

Unfortunately though, many Australians, and other Westerners, will be deprived of true news by an agenda that no longer speaks to facts, but relies instead on character assassination and judgment by name calling.  

 

The people of the West appear to support this stance by their mainstream media outlets, at least the majority, by you even reading these words shows that you are not one of them.

 

So, what are your thoughts on these issues?  I would like very much to hear from you. 

Sorcha Faal

Dublin, Ireland



Is It To Late?
12,March, 2007, 1:00 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

“What can Americans do to prevent their country from becoming a fascist state? Is it too late?” From: Druthers on 22/2/2007

Thank you for this question Druthers, let me try to answer if first by asking you to read and understand the following definitions:

Fascism: A governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Capitalism: An economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations

Socialism: A theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

Communism: A theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state

Monarchy: Supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.

Now I’d like you to read and ‘really’ understand the following:

U.S. Army Training Manual TM2000-05, 1928

Democracy, n. “A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any form of “direct” expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic – negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.”

From the preceding you, or anyone, should be able to see that it is not that easy to ‘lump’ governments, any government, into one neat and concise ‘package’. 

This is so because all governments are made up of people; and with that being understood any government will have as part of its characteristic the personality of its leader, or leaders.

Since the beginning of our history the management, and rule, of vast numbers of human beings has vexed even the most noble of leaders, with the main paradigm for controlling human beings being a centralized government led by ruthless people.

You are not take from my words, either, that by saying ruthless I am using it in a negative connotation, which I’m not, but rather in its correct form of being  ‘without pity or compassion’, and which to some extent everyone of us has to be at times.

In its most correct form, your country, the United States, is a Capitalist Democracy, or in other words; “A system of human control managed by corporations for profit above the welfare of its citizens utilizing mob rule.”

This is neither a good system of government, nor a bad one, as it has within its matrix those mechanisms necessary to correct imbalances, and as your history has shown for over 200 years.

Viewed in its proper perspective, the present day United States is no more authoritative and manipulative of its citizens than at any other prior time in its existence, and this can also be said of many other governments of long standing.

For you, or anyone in America, to believe that the system of government you have is the worst your Nation has ever seen is to deny your entire history. 

It is important to remember that the very founding of your Nation, and its rapid ascent to World dominance, was first based upon the extermination of the indigenous peoples of North America to steal their land, and which can be correctly called genocide.

The 19th Century saw the mass exploitation of the entire population of the United States by its capitalists (Robber Barons) and those they had put into positions of power, including the Presidents.

In the middle of the 19th Century saw the most brutal war in American history called the Civil War, and which had nothing to do with slavery and everything to do with the capitalists needing a stronger centralized government for their continued rapid expansion.

It must be remembered that prior to the Civil War there was no such thing as American money as the excepted exchange medium (currency) was privately issued bank notes, and of which there were thousands.

In order to finance the Civil War the eventual winners (both ideological an economically) created for the first time in your history a unified currency called the Green Back.

A further consolidation of the capitalists expanding power occurred in the early 20th Century with the creation of a Central Bank, and which you know now as the Federal Reserve System.

Now, I could on in this line, for thousands of pages in fact, but let’s suffice it say that your type of government cannot be separated from its currency or from your currencies creators and backers, the capitalists.

 You should also note that in a capitalistic system such as yours everyone is a capitalist, even you yourself, should you supply the right product and/or idea to your fellow citizens you too would be awash in wealth.  In other systems of government this is not possible.

Also to note is that with a capitalist system, such as yours, the methods of controlling the masses are severe in that at any given moment (The Great Depression of the 1930’s is but one example.) the people are likely to rebel against what they see are the inherent injustices in the system.

This is important to note because in a capitalist system the forces of the state (Police, Judiciary, and Military) are all designed to protect and support the capitalists, not the people as a whole.

As to the survival of the United States it is without doubt that it will because over the past 200 years it has proved adept, and sometimes ruthlessly so, at protecting what it has gained and its power to expand its base, and as we are seeing today in its reaching every corner of the World.

What the average American citizen is failing to understand is that the very term ‘United States’ no longer represents a Nation, or a people alone, but rather it is today a term used to describe a capitalist power bloc that has transcended traditional physical borders and lies outside the ability of any single nations government to either control or regulate.

How the World will adapt to this new force is open for debate only to those who do not understand history, but to those of us who do the ONLY outcome of the ‘battle’ between the outmoded Nation/State and Capitalist/Democracy is a two tiered system of control, one for the corporations, the other for human beings.

The only functional way this two tired system can exist, however, is on a Global basis…that’s right, a One World Government.

To fully understand how this works you need only look at the European Union (EU) where there is one system of government for its citizens (locally made but under the ‘guidelines’ of the EU), and another for its corporations (which are able to make their own laws to the extent that the EU framework allows).

You will see this also occur in the United States; in fact it is happening now with the creation of what is called the North American Union, and which will comprise the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Once the ‘major’ World confederations are made (EU, North American Union, ASIAN Trade Block, etc.) then you will see the melding of these units into a single unifying structure.

As to your question of it being ‘too late’, of course it is!



Let’s Start Again
12,March, 2007, 12:55 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

Please forgive me, again, as I attempt to more fully understand what blogging is, how it can best serve you, and how I should manage it in the time allotted to me.

In my first attempt (see below) I imaged it would be as simple as directly answering your questions, it isn’t because there isn’t enough time for me to write the type of answer deserving of your questions. (Though from time to time I may single out one particular question for an in depth answer.)

So, in the past few weeks I’ve had a number of conversations, with many trusted aides, and have arrived at a solution for best managing this blog, and my time, while at the same time providing to you the kind of information you seem most interested in knowing about.

Towards that end I’m asking you, the readers of this blog, to send me questions via email to sorchafaal@fastmail.fm and putting in the subject line “Sorcha Questions”, this will ‘fast track’ directly to me personally.

The types of questions I would like to answer are those dealing with solutions to problems, such as the one asked by Druthers, “What can Americans do to prevent their country from becoming a fascist state? Is it too late?”

In this way, I believe, we’ll be able to establish a more consistent dialogue between us pointed more towards solving problems than creating them.

Personal questions about your own life are welcome too. I may not have the correct solution you may need, but more minds working on any problem are better than one going it alone.

I hope to hear from many of you soon!